Marius Copil vs Michael Berrer Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L L L L L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LHead To Head: Copil 3 - 0 Berrer
They have played 8 sets in total, with Copil winning 6 and Berrer winning 2. The last match between Copil and Berrer was at the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai, 22-02-2014, Q1 round, Hard with Marius Copil getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marius Copil | 3 |
| Michael Berrer | 0 |
Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships - Dubai(22-02-2014)
6
7
6
4
6
4
| Copil | Stats | Berrer |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 706 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 42 |
| 34 | Age | 44 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 8 | Titles | 11 |
| 54% (508-429) | Career Total W/L | 55% (539-435) |
| $1,305,320 | Career Prize Money | $1,293,223 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Michael Berrer
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
50 of
57)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
55 of
71)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
23 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Michael Berrer
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
20%
(
14 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Michael Berrer
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 46 | Games Won | 36 |
| 31 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:36:40 | Average Match Time | 1:36:40 |
| 63% (145/229) | 1st Serve % | 67% (160/238) |
| 83% (120/145) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (119/160) |
| 62% (52/84) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (42/78) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (2/9) |
| 32% (77/238) | Return Points Win % | 25% (57/229) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Marius Copil
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Michael Berrer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Michael Berrer
40%
(
31 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
13
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62%
(
29 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Alexey Vatutin
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Peter Torebko
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Michael Berrer
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Michael Berrer
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
116)
11
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Vasek Pospisil
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Artem Sitak
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vincent Millot
Player
Michael Berrer
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Berrer
Player
Adrian Andreev
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (508/429) | Win/Loss | 55% (539/435) |
| 53% (1182/1033) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1265/1076) |
| 51% (11371/10901) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11708/11085) |
| 50% (117/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (158/123) |
| 48% (151/166) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (104/123) |
| 63% (196/116) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (245/152) |
| 59% (44/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (32/37) |
| 0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 6741 | Aces Total | 2978 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2098 | Total Double Faults | 1573 |
| 1:10:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 537.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 84.79 |
| 59% (30669/52322) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25501/39329) |
| 76% (23337/30669) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18388/25501) |
| 53% (11393/21653) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7011/13836) |
| 37% (1431/3829) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1290/3323) |
| 35% (18063/52250) | Return Points Win % | 36% (14325/39383) |
| 44% (30/38) | Slam W/L | 55% (56/46) |
| 37% (17/29) | Masters W/L | 42% (29/40) |
| 60% (18/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 51% (95/91) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (158/154) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (250/201) | Challenger W/L | 61% (292/187) |
| 63% (98/58) | Futures W/L | 40% (4/6) |
| 55% (492/897) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (517/922) |
| 41% (11/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (14/40) |
| 52% (238/454) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (197/385) |
| 51% (162/316) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (178/347) |
| 83% (511/424) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (543/445) |
| 17% (511/87) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (543/97) |
| 19% (426/81) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (431/94) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
